|
Question:
Jennifer: Answer: CC, tough question and depending on who you ask and their specialty (atty, biller, coder, acct), I bet you get a few different answers. My general answer, as I do not have enough information to comment specifically on your particular arrangement, is the billing for a particular service must be by the Tax ID of the entity under which the services are provided. To determine which entity the services are provided by, I would look towards the written contracts in place (because, of course, we have written contracts in place, as they are required), and I would get down to the meat of things and determine who works where. The entity the practitioner is associated with for whom you are billing is the entity that should be reflected by Tax ID number on any HCFA. Also, the practitioner actually rendering services should be indicated where appropriate. To use your example, the professional services rendered by a practitioner at the satellite clinic for the injection received by the patient – the cost of the drug and professional administration – should be billed under the clinic. The Hospital’s Pharmacy is not providing the drug for free, so it follows the Hospital would have to be compensated and why not through a deduction/pass-through of the expense of the cost of the drug – through overhead. To address the site of service – 22 v 11 – the language that I am familiar with allows the use of 22 only where an article 28 licensed facility is in play – and excepts out that code by use of a physician practice. I don’t see how you can use those codes interchangeably. It sounds as though the many entities in the same location seem to be blurring the line as to appropriate operational standards. I recommend sorting out the arrangement to clarify who is doing what on behalf of whom before a (or many) payors identify a lack of consistency and potential error(s). If you require a more thorough answer, please do not hesitate to contact me. I would be happy to work on the arrangement and ensure you are structured correctly. Copyright © 2011 by Kirschenbaum & Kirschenbaum PC. All Rights Reserved. This email is provided for news and information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or an invitation to an attorney-client relationship. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, Kirschenbaum & Kirschenbaum PC does not guarantee such accuracy and cannot be held liable for any errors in, any reliance upon this, or losses caused by the information. Under New York’s Code of Professional Responsibility, this material may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. |

